Friday, May 9, 2008

revisiting

i'm revisiting the oompa loomp vs munchkin question.

thank you laura for your insight and comment in the last post. i would tend to agree with you; an oompa loompa would definitely win the fight, convincingly. so much so that vegas would be afraid to even put odds down.

but i can't agree that they'd win because of your reasoning.

"The answer is obvious. The Oompa Loompa would win because they reproduce
asexually within seconds and could overwhelm even the largest population of
munchkins."

yes, the answer is obvious. but it's because oompa loompas are fatter. wait. no. thicker. look, you try to tell me that you live in a (ponders whether to curse...............) fucking (my dirty mouth wins) chocolate factory and doing chocolate factory chores - most of which i'm assuming consist of stirring and tasting and carrying bags of corn syrup, cocoa, and food coloring - and you're not going to be abnormally large? plus they sing songs that are borderline demonizing (read dark). and by all accounts don't get laid - major rage. meanwhile, these little munchkin things live in a land of make-believe, just kidding, more like a dream land. they walk crooked. sing happy go lucky songs. probably have munchkin sex (how's the for a nice thought) and strictly from what i've seen, don't eat anything (which, makes me ponder how the hell dorothy made it to oz, you know she was hungry).

no contest - the bigger, more angry group wins.

i don't know. maybe i think about these things too literally?

No comments: